Resilience has long been considered a fundamental characteristic for individual and collective well-being. Traditionally, it has enabled people to overcome adversity, adapt to change, and thrive in the face of challenges. However, recent discourse suggests that people today may be less resilient than previous generations. This paper explores the validity of this claim by examining the factors that have influenced resilience over the past three decades. It delves into the changing societal, cultural, and technological landscapes, investigating how these shifts have impacted individuals' ability to cope with adversity.
Defining Resilience
Resilience is often defined as the capacity to recover from setbacks, adapt to change, and keep going in the face of adversity. Psychologists like Ann Masten describe it as "ordinary magic," emphasizing that resilience is not an extraordinary trait but rather a common human capacity developed through everyday experiences (Masten, 2001). Traditionally, resilience has been fostered by a combination of individual traits, such as optimism and perseverance, and external factors, such as social support and community cohesion. Over time, however, these protective factors have evolved, raising questions about whether resilience has declined as a result.
Resilience 30 Years Ago: A Baseline
Three decades ago, resilience was often associated with the ability to endure hardship without significant external support. The social fabric of the time played a crucial role in fostering resilience, with strong community ties, stable family structures, and consistent social norms providing a supportive environment for individuals facing adversity. Economic stability, coupled with a slower pace of life and fewer technological distractions, allowed people to develop coping mechanisms over time. These factors collectively contributed to a baseline level of resilience that many now regard as higher than what is observed in contemporary society.
- Community and Social Support
Thirty years ago, communities were more tightly knit, with neighbors often forming close relationships and providing mutual support. This sense of community played a significant role in helping individuals cope with challenges. Research shows that strong social networks are a key factor in resilience, as they provide emotional support, practical assistance, and a sense of belonging (Ungar, 2011). The decline of such networks in recent years may have weakened one of the critical pillars of resilience.
- Family Dynamics
The family unit has historically been a cornerstone of resilience, offering stability and guidance during difficult times. In the 1990s, families were generally more stable, with lower divorce rates and fewer single-parent households than today. This stability allowed children to develop strong emotional bonds and a sense of security, which are essential components of resilience (Rutter, 1987). Changes in family dynamics over the past 30 years have raised concerns about their impact on the resilience of younger generations.
- Economic Conditions
The economic landscape of the early 1990s was characterized by relatively stable employment opportunities and a lower cost of living compared to today. This stability provided individuals with a sense of security, enabling them to focus on long-term goals and develop resilience over time (Bonanno, 2004). Economic pressures, including the rise of the gig economy and increased financial insecurity, have since altered the context in which resilience is cultivated.
Changes in the Past 20 Years: The Impact of Technology and Societal Shifts
Over the past two decades, several significant changes have influenced resilience, particularly the rapid advancement of technology and shifts in societal norms. While these developments have brought about numerous benefits, they have also introduced new challenges that may have undermined resilience.
- The Digital Age and Its Discontents
The rise of the digital age has dramatically altered how people interact, work, and relax. While technology has made life more convenient, it has also introduced challenges that previous generations did not face. The constant connectivity enabled by smartphones and social media can lead to information overload, anxiety, and a diminished ability to disconnect from stressors (Twenge, 2017). Research suggests that the pervasive use of social media can erode face-to-face social interactions, contributing to feelings of isolation and reducing the social support that is critical for resilience (Primack et al., 2017).
- Changing Social Norms and Expectations
Societal expectations have also shifted, with an increasing emphasis on individual achievement and the pressure to succeed in a highly competitive environment. The rise of "hustle culture" and the glorification of constant productivity have contributed to a sense of burnout and decreased resilience (Maslach & Leiter, 2016). Additionally, the erosion of traditional social norms, such as the decline of communal activities and the weakening of religious and civic institutions, has reduced the opportunities for individuals to build resilience through collective experiences.
- The Rise of Mental Health Awareness
While the past two decades have seen increased awareness and destigmatization of mental health issues, this has paradoxically led to a heightened sensitivity to stressors and challenges. The emphasis on mental health has encouraged individuals to seek help and speak openly about their struggles, but it has also contributed to a cultural shift where resilience is sometimes perceived as less essential or even counterproductive (Southwick et al., 2014). The balance between promoting mental health and fostering resilience is delicate, and the increased focus on the former may have inadvertently weakened the latter.
The Last 10 Years: A Perfect Storm of Challenges
The past decade has presented an array of unprecedented challenges that have tested individual and collective resilience. Economic instability, political polarization, and the COVID-19 pandemic have all contributed to a sense of uncertainty and vulnerability, raising questions about whether people today are less resilient than in the past.
- Economic Pressures and Inequality
The 2008 financial crisis and its aftermath marked the beginning of a period of economic turbulence that continues to affect people today. The growing income inequality, rising housing costs, and job insecurity have made it increasingly difficult for individuals to maintain a stable financial footing, undermining resilience (Reeves, 2017). The economic pressures of the past decade have disproportionately affected younger generations, who face higher student debt and fewer job opportunities than their predecessors.
- The COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic represents a significant test of resilience on a global scale. The widespread disruptions to daily life, including lockdowns, social distancing, and economic uncertainty, have placed immense stress on individuals and communities. While the pandemic has revealed the resilience of healthcare workers and essential personnel, it has also exposed vulnerabilities in mental health and social support systems (Pfefferbaum & North, 2020). The long-term impact of the pandemic on resilience is still unfolding, but it has undoubtedly reshaped how people cope with adversity.
- Political Polarization and Social Unrest
The past decade has also been marked by increased political polarization and social unrest, contributing to a sense of instability and division. The rise of populism, the erosion of democratic norms, and the intensification of cultural conflicts have all heightened stress levels and eroded social cohesion, key components of resilience (Putnam, 2000). The fragmentation of society along political and ideological lines has made it more challenging to build collective resilience in the face of shared challenges.
The Decline of Resilience: Causes and Consequences
The evidence suggests that resilience may indeed be declining, with several factors contributing to this trend. The erosion of community ties, changes in family dynamics, the pressures of the digital age, and the challenges of the past decade have all played a role in weakening resilience. This decline has significant consequences for mental health, social cohesion, and the ability to navigate an increasingly complex world.
- The Role of Instant Gratification
One of the key changes in recent years is the rise of instant gratification, driven by technological advancements and consumer culture. The ease with which people can access information, goods, and services has reduced the need for delayed gratification and perseverance, traits that are essential for resilience (Baumeister & Tierney, 2011). The expectation of immediate results and the avoidance of discomfort may have weakened individuals' ability to cope with setbacks and challenges.
- The Impact on Mental Health
The decline in resilience has significant implications for mental health. Increased rates of anxiety, depression, and stress-related disorders are often cited as evidence of reduced resilience in the face of life's challenges (Twenge, 2017). The emphasis on avoiding stress and discomfort, while important for mental health, may also contribute to a reduced capacity for resilience, as individuals become less accustomed to dealing with adversity.
- Social and Economic Consequences
The decline in resilience also has broader social and economic implications. A less resilient population may be less able to adapt to economic changes, leading to increased reliance on social safety nets and government support. Additionally, reduced resilience can weaken social cohesion, making it more challenging to address collective challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and public health crises (Southwick et al., 2014).
Conclusion
The evidence suggests that people today may indeed be less resilient than they were 10, 20, or 30 years ago. While resilience remains a critical trait, its decline can be attributed to a complex interplay of factors, including technological advancements, changing social norms, economic pressures, and recent global challenges. The implications of this decline are far-reaching, affecting mental health, social cohesion, and the ability to navigate an increasingly uncertain world. Addressing the decline in resilience will require a concerted effort to rebuild community ties, foster adaptive coping strategies, and balance the emphasis on mental health with the need for resilience. As society continues to evolve, understanding and addressing the factors that contribute to resilience will be essential for ensuring individual and collective well-being.
References
Baumeister, R. F., & Tierney, J. (2011). Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength. Penguin Press.
Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20-28.
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227-238.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Burnout: A Brief History and How to Beat It. Harvard Business Review Press.
Pfefferbaum, B., & North, C. S. (2020). Mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic. The New England Journal of Medicine, 383(6), 510-512.
Primack, B. A., Shensa, A., Sidani, J. E., Whaite, E. O., Lin, L. Y., Rosen, D., ... & Miller, E. (2017). Social media use and perceived social isolation among young adults in the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 53(1), 1-8.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
Reeves, R. V. (2017). Dream Hoarders: How the American Upper Middle Class Is Leaving Everyone Else in the Dust, Why That Is a Problem, and What to Do about It. Brookings Institution Press.
Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial Resilience and Protective Mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.
Southwick, S. M., Litz, B. T., Charney, D., & Friedman, M. J. (2014). Resilience and Mental Health: Challenges Across the Lifespan. Cambridge University Press.
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy--and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood. Atria Books.
Ungar, M. (2011). The Social Ecology of Resilience: Addressing Contextual and Cultural Ambiguity of a Nascent Construct. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(1), 1-17.